The Iowa football team once again has suffered fallouts at the running back position, this season with the suspensions of leading rusher Marcus Coker and promising freshman Mika'il McCall for the Insight Bowl. McCall had a post on his Facebook account (later deleted) that he was going to leave the program but nothing has become official. Yet.
Similar problems have emerged the past couple seasons, leaving fans wondering what has happened.
Going back to the 2008 recruiting class, Iowa has signed 13 running backs in the last four classes. The results: 2 have changed position, 5 have left the school, 2 are currrently suspended and four are in good standing. The specifics:
2008 Class
- Jeff Brinson: Left the program, transferred to Central Florida. An ACL injury in September 2010, his second in college, ended his career.
- Jewel Hampton: Left the program, transferred to Southern Illinois. He was SIU's leading ball carrier this season, rushing for 1,157 yards and 17 touchdowns.
- Adam Robinson. Suspended before last season's Insight Bowl. Transferred to Minnesota-Duluth and sat out this season.
- Nate Guillory. A junior college recruit, he left Iowa almost before he arrived. He transferred to NAIA Northwestern Oklahoma State, where he rushed for 2,858 yards and 32 TDs in two seasons.
- William Lowe. Switched to defensive back, where he had a couple of productive seasons. Left the program before his senior year after being identified as one of the Rhabdo 13.
2009 Class - Brad Rogers. Switched to fullback, overcame some heart ailments and now is a productive starter.
- Brandon Wegher. Left the program after a series of problems. Briefly surfaced at Oklahoma and Iowa Western Community College, but currently is out of football.
2010 Class - Marcus Coker. Iowa's leading rusher this season suspended for unspecified reasons.
- DeAndre Johnson. Has seen brief action, rushing for 79 yards on 18 attempts this season.
- Anthony Hitchens. Switched to linebacker, where he has seen action in seven games this year.
2011 Class - Damon Bullock. Eight carries for 22 yards this year.
- Jordan Canzeri. Nine carries for 56 yards this year.
- Mika'il McCall. Got off to good start, injured his knee, returned only to be suspended.
(Rodney Coe, recruited as an "athlete,'' also was in this class and may have been tried at running back. He transferred to Iowa Western, though, and gained 470 yards and scored 9 TDs this season).
Not so long ago, Iowa fans wondered if there would be enough footballs to go around with the running back depth of Hampton, Wegher and Robinson. Now, this week, the Hawkeyes go into a bowl game against the preseason No. 1-ranked team with a walk-on (Jason White), two true freshmen (Bullock and Canzeri) and a red-shirt freshman (Johnson) at the tailback position.
(These thoughts also posted at Metro Sports Report)
It's the most hypocritical time of the year for college football.
The first few of 35 bowl games have been played. We'll be watching them the rest of this year and well into next. Players will be making sacrifices by spending time away from family as they prepare for games, but don't feel too sorry for them.
Every bowl game offers plenty of gifts for players, up to $550 worth of swag for as many as 125 individuals. Schools also are allowed to tack on another $400 worth of gifts, bringing to $950 the value of benefits players could receive.
Do the math. That's as much as $118,750 per team in benefits and as much as $8 million awarded to college football bowl participants. A player who goes to four bowl games during his career (as Iowa seniors are doing) can rake in $3,000 to $4,000 worth of gifts in a career.
And I emphasize the word "benefits.''
The National College Athletic Association is all about college athletes not receiving "extra benefits,'' those perks not normally afforded the casual college student. The NCAA scrutinizes coaches, athletic directors and athletic departments, making sure they stay within the rules.
Coaches cannot have their team or a few recruits over to the house for a barbeque. A booster cannot give an athlete money for a dinner or shopping trip. The NCAA rule book is thick and cumbersome, but the governing body expects every individual to walk the line.
Iowa and Oklahoma players involved in the Insight Bowl this week will receive an Ogio Convoy backpack, a cap and a shopping spree at a gift suite. Pinstripe Bowl participants Iowa State and Rutgers will get a choice of gifts at the Sony Style store and a tour of the MTV studios.
Other gifts at other bowls include watches, souvenir footballs, a $400 shopping spree at Best Buy, iPods, Kindles, 32-inch flat screen televisions, and on and on.
Oh, those poor college athletes. They claim they spend so much time refining their skills and practicing that they don't have any means of going out for a pizza or a movie. Then after the bowl games, they go back to their campuses, gorge on free meals, seek free tutors and further their free education.
OK, colleges make a lot of money off football, from gate receipts to merchandise sales. But don't tell me the athletes don't get much in return.
And the NCAA? It is often portrayed as The Scrooge of college athletics. But in bowl season, it is the Santa Claus that stops on every doorstep, delivering toys to their boys, naughty or nice.
(This story was originally written for Metro Sports report)
He went from the plains of the Midwest to the bright lights of New York City, a lightly recruited high school quarterback who reached the doorstep of college football's most coveted individual award.
Chuck Long led his Wheaton (Ill.) North High School team to a state championship but it was largely a running team and Long averaged only five or six pass attempts per game. Iowa coaches never saw him play in person, but they offered him a scholarship after watching 11 game films. Northern Illinois and Northwestern were his only other suitors.
By the time his college career was over, Long amassed numerous records and played in five bowl games for the Hawkeyes. He was the first player to pass for over 10,000 yards in a college career. He was given an extra year of eligibility due to a red-shirt rule that no longer exists.
So he decided to forego the NFL draft and return for another season in 1985. Long quickly emerged as a leading candidate for the Heisman Trophy along with Auburn running back Bo Jackson. Long had led Iowa to the Big Ten championship and a Rose Bowl berth, with signature victories over No. 2 Michigan and Michigan State.
When it became apparent that Long could become the second Iowa player to win the Heisman, joining Nile Kinnick in 1939, I asked Long if he had any objection to my joining him on his trip to New York City for the Heisman announcement.
On Dec. 7, 1985, a quarterback and a sportswriter set sail for the Big Apple.
I MET LONG and his then-girl friend, Lisa, at the Cedar Rapids airport. Long was as calm and composed as he often appeared in the pocket, searching downfield for a receiver.
We flew to St. Louis for the connecting flight to New York City. During about an hour layover, the three of us engaged in light conversation. Even though Long would be on national television in a few hours, no one in the terminal recognized him or sought him out for an autograph.
Chuck and Lisa took their seats a few rows from mine, buckling in like two normal passengers. But during the flight, the pilot came over the intercom and made this announcement: "Ladies and gentlemen, we are joined on our flight today by Iowa quarterback Chuck Long, who is a candidate for the Heisman Trophy.''
Passengers applauded and Long obliged with a short wave of his hand. Some approached Long for his autograph. A few others wished him good luck.
After landing at LaGuardia Airport in New York, the Longs were whisked to a limousine. I had planned to take a taxi to my hotel, but Long insisted that I ride in the limo with him and Lisa. It was about a 15-minute trip to Lower Manhattan and the Downtown Athletic Club, which at that time was the site of the Heisman presentation. (The Downtown Athletic Club was located about a half-mile south of the World Trade Center. Although it was not damaged in the 9-11 attacks, the DAC closed after those events. The public was banned from the area during clean-up; the club suffered financial losses and never re-opened).
It was during the limo ride that I sensed reality had set in with Long. The magnitude of the day had hit him. Would he really win the Heisman Trophy? I shook hands with Long, thanked him for the ride and off he went. I didn't see Chuck again until the actual ceremony.
SINCE 2005, THE Heisman presentation has been made at the Best Buy Theater in Times Square. Most members of the media do not sit in the same area where the presentation is made; rather they are assembled in an adjoining room.
But in 1985, reporters viewed the proceedings in the same room. I joined a few other members of the Iowa media delegation near the back of the room. Bob Costas mingled near us with some dignitaries before hosting the national television coverage.
The introduction of each Heisman finalist was accompanied by a five-minute video presentation. Long's began with footage of Kinnick, then showed Long alone walking on the Kinnick Stadium field. The clip included some of Long's greatest plays during the season and interview segments. Long noted that among his motivations was his younger brother, Andy, who had cerebral palsy.
The live TV camera then panned to Long, seated in the front row and dressed in a gray suit, white shirt and red tie. Behind him sat Iowa Coach Hayden Fry and Long's family.
As the announcement drew nearer, you could feel tension in the room. Long and Jackson were widely considered the leading candidates, although Sports Illustrated writer Rick Reilly had something to say about that. Reilly instead trumpeted the candidacy of running back Joe Dudek, who had set Division III records at Plymouth State in New Hampshire. A couple weeks before the Heisman ceremony, Jackson, Long and Dudek appeared on the Sports Illustrated cover.
BO JACKSON WAS named winner of the 1985 Heisman Trophy in the closest vote in its history, a 45-point margin. Jackson had 1,509 points to Long's 1,464. Jackson garnered 317 first-place votes to Long's 286.
It was difficult to argue against Jackson. He rushed for 1,786 yards and 17 touchdowns for Auburn, although he twice pulled himself from games due to injuries. Long passed for 2,978 yards and 26 touchdowns during the regular season with 15 interceptions.
Jackson and Long both carried three of the six regions of the country. Long carried the Northeast, Southwest and Far West; Jackson took the Mid-Atlantic, South and Midwest. Some of the Midwestern votes that Long might have received went to Michigan State running back Lorenzo White and Purdue quarterback Jim Everett, who finished fourth and sixth in the balloting, respectively. Dudek finished ninth with 12 first-place votes.
Long was gracious in interviews after the presentation, as were Jackson and Auburn Coach Pat Dye toward Long.
The 1985 vote no longer is the closest in history. It was bettered in 2009 when Mark Ingram of Alabama nudged Stanford's Toby Gearhart by 28 points.
Interestingly, Long won the Maxwell Award in 1985. Awarded by the Maxwell Football Club of Philadelphia, it also recognizes the best player in college football.
CHUCK LONG MARRIED Lisa in 1987 and they have five children, three girls and two boys. Chuck most recently has been offensive coordinator at Kansas, where head coach Turner Gill was recently fired and replaced by former Notre Dame Coach Charlie Weis.
Long was the 12th pick in the 1986 NFL draft, going to the Detroit Lions. Long threw a touchdown pass on his first NFL play but largely struggled behind a weak Lions' offensive line.
After his NFL career, Long had assistant coaching stops at Iowa and Oklahoma before landing the head coaching job at San Diego State. After going 9-27 in three seasons, Long was fired.
Long's journey has been a mixture of highs and lows since he left Iowa. But when he looks back at his college career and the day he almost won the Heisman Trophy, the memories have to be priceless.
Every time Iowa loses a football game, the most recent of which was at Penn State, some fans clamor for head coach Kirk Ferentz's head. More amusing is the fact they play the money card, throwing out Ferentz's annual salary and wondering if he's worth it all.
Folks, be careful what you wish for. Ferentz is squarely on the Mount Rushmore of Iowa football coaches no matter how you cut it.
Who has the best 3-year run in Hawkeye history?
1. Forest Evashevski (1956-58) - 24-3-2 overall, 14-3-1 in Big Ten, 2 league titles, 2 Rose Bowl wins.
2. Howard Jones (1921-23) - 17-3 overall, 13-3 in Big Ten, 2 league titles. (Jones went on to coach USC to five Rose Bowl wins)
3. Kirk Ferentz (2002-2004) - 31-7 overall, 20-4 in Big Ten, 2 league title shares, 2-1 in bowls.
4. Hayden Fry (1985-87) - 29-8 overall, 18-6 in Big Ten, 1 league title, 2-1 in bowls.
Ferentz has the worst overall (.559) and Big Ten (.552) winning percentages compared to the other three, but those are still among the best in Iowa history. In bowl games, Ferentz is 6-3 while Fry went 6-7-1.
It is incredible to think Iowa has had just two head coaches in 32 years, isn't it? During that time, the Hawks have gone to 23 bowl games, been ranked in the Top 10 in the final polls six times and won or shared five conference titles. Ferentz has had four teams finish among the nation's Top 10, Fry had two squads land at No. 10.
Problem is, with each season of success, Iowa fans have greater and greater expectations. Let's not be too short-sighted if the Hawkeyes happen to drop a game here and there.
Twitter. The new frontier, the latest and greatest vehicle for breaking news.
This fact, which younger people already knew, was hammered home to this hard-headed, old-school journalist Tuesday afternoon. I was listening to Balbinot & Brommelkamp on 1600 ESPN on my way home. Todd Brommelkamp, social media nut, broke into the conversation with breaking news. He said a Boston reporter had tweeted nine minutes prior that Red Sox general manager Theo Epstein was on the verge of signing on with the Chicago Cubs.
That sparked a new trail of conversation for Balbinot & Brommelkamp, and their listeners. It also set off a light bulb in my cob-webbed head.
Twitter was created five years ago and has approximately 200 million users, but I'm just now catching on. KGYM created a Twitter page for The Gym Class recently and I have tweeted relatively useless information a handful of times. I'm one of those challenged by social networking and blogging (hey, I still know people who don't have a cell phone!).
But Brommelkamp's work got me to thinking about the reporting of news and how it has evolved over the last few decades.
I got into the newspaper business in 1972 when you produced your work on typewriters, sent copy to the press room through pneumatic tubes, and the men would reproduce the stories on linotype machines. If you broke a story, you had to wait for the news cycle to come around. In the early days, there was a paper that hit the streets in the afternoon and you had to have your information by noon or 1 p.m. Later, with the advent of morning papers, information could be collected throughout the day and could get in the paper as long as you had it by about midnight.
The first story I ever broke was in 1978 when Earle Bruce fled Iowa State to take the head football job at Ohio State. The brother of the best man in my wedding was a player at Iowa State (lucky me) and he called me to say there had been a team meeting, at which Bruce announced his decision. My previous night's story hit the Associated Press wire nationally the next morning.
Back then, there was no Twitter, no Facebook, no Internet, no blogs, none of that. Otherwise, the information I had could have been spread almost instantly. Radio and television were the only live media vehicles then, and it's that way today. Unless newspapers have websites, they don't break news any more in the print version.
The only danger with Twitter I see is in verification of news. People can spew any thought they choose on Twitter and Facebook. Brommelkamp was quick to point out his source and the fact that the information was not official.
I still think there needs to be independent verification of information by reporters. Most do, but there is so much information produced now that is not necessarily worthy of a Pulitzer.
Even so, the technology these days is damn exciting.